Rajneesh and others vs State Government — 846/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPGZ010020732026
Filing Number
1973/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
846/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District & Session Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
mahila thana gzb
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajneesh and others
Adv. Rajpal singh kori
-
2.Raj Bahadur
-
3.Sushila
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Government
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
bail orderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Court, Ghaziabad, granted bail to three accused (Rajnish, Rajbahadur Singh, and Sushila) in a dowry harassment case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, and 506. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the complainant's allegations of demands for ₹10 lakh and a car, physical torture, and threats. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with conditions to attend trial proceedings and not tamper with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District & Session Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Order/Disposal
District & Session Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Order/Disposal
District & Session Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Order/Disposal
District & Session Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
bail orderView PDF
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 846/2026
Summary The Sessions Court, Ghaziabad, granted bail to three accused (Rajnish, Rajbahadur Singh, and Sushila) in a dowry harassment case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, and 506. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the complainant's allegations of demands for ₹10 lakh and a car, physical torture, and threats. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with conditions to attend trial proceedings and not tamper with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts