Rajneesh and others vs State Government — 846/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPGZ010020732026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1973/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

846/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

mahila thana gzb

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

Rajneesh and others

Adv. Rajpal singh kori

Raj Bahadur

Sushila

Respondent(s)

State Government

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

19-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Order/Disposal

09-03-2026

Order/Disposal

25-02-2026

Order/Disposal

13-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
bail order

Summary The Sessions Court, Ghaziabad, granted bail to three accused (Rajnish, Rajbahadur Singh, and Sushila) in a dowry harassment case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, and 506. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the complainant's allegations of demands for ₹10 lakh and a car, physical torture, and threats. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with conditions to attend trial proceedings and not tamper with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

13-02-2026
bail order
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Ghaziabad, granted bail to three accused (Rajnish, Rajbahadur Singh, and Sushila) in a dowry harassment case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, and 506. The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the complainant's allegations of demands for ₹10 lakh and a car, physical torture, and threats. The accused were released on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with conditions to attend trial proceedings and not tamper with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case