State Government vs Mahesh rai — 2304741/2004
Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
Cri. Case
CNR: UPGK160011592004
Filing Number
2304741/2004
Filing Date
06-Dec-2004
Registration No
2304741/2004
Registration Date
06-Dec-2004
Court
Railway Court Gorakhpur
Judge
23-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
176/04
Police Station
G.R.P. Gorakhpur
Year
2004
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahesh rai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Gorakhpur acquitted Mahesh Rai of charges under Sections 21/22 of the NDPS Act (possession of 230 contraband tablets found at Gorakhpur railway station on 05.10.2004) because the prosecution failed to present any witnesses despite multiple court opportunities over approximately 20 years of proceedings. The court emphasized that prolonged trial delays violate Article 21 of the Constitution and noted the absence of credible evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
24-Feb-2026
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
11-Feb-2026
Statement U/S 313
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
23-Dec-2025
F. O./ Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
12-Nov-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
27-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
09-Jul-2025
F. O./ Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
16-Apr-2025
F. O./ Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
16-Dec-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
26-Jun-2024
F. O./ Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
02-Apr-2024
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
04-Dec-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
18-Sep-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
21-Jun-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
05-Jun-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
08-May-2023
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
20-Feb-2023
F. O./ Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
22-Nov-2022
F. O./ Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
07-Sep-2022
F. O./ Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
13-Jun-2022
F. O./ Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
11-Jun-2022
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
15-Mar-2022
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
11-Jan-2022
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
26-Oct-2021
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
28-Jul-2021
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
05-May-2021
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
17-Feb-2021
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
16-Feb-2021
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
22-Dec-2020
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
23-Sep-2020
Appearance
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
20-Jul-2020
Summon
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
05-May-2020
Summon
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
25-Feb-2020
Summon
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
14-Jan-2020
Summon
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
10-Dec-2019
Summon
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
12-Nov-2019
Summon
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
16-Oct-2019
Summon
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
04-Sep-2019
Summon
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
06-Aug-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
18-Jun-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
27-Mar-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
29-Jan-2019
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
17-Oct-2018
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
24-Jul-2018
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
07-May-2018
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
13-Mar-2018
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
03-Jan-2018
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
21-Nov-2017
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
18-Sep-2017
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
19-Jul-2017
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
10-May-2017
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
27-Feb-2017
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
25-Jan-2017
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
07-Dec-2016
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
06-Sep-2016
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
23-Jun-2016
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
11-Apr-2016
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
02-Feb-2016
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
04-Nov-2015
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
21-Sep-2015
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
01-Jun-2015
Evidence
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
-
22-Aug-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Dec-2004
Case filed
Registration No. 2304741/2004
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Gorakhpur acquitted Mahesh Rai of charges under Sections 21/22 of the NDPS Act (possession of 230 contraband tablets found at Gorakhpur railway station on 05.10.2004) because the prosecution failed to present any witnesses despite multiple court opportunities over approximately 20 years of proceedings. The court emphasized that prolonged trial delays violate Article 21 of the Constitution and noted the absence of credible evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts