State Govenrment vs MANOJ DWIVEDI — 2300999/2003
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
Cri. Case
CNR: UPGK160008702003
Filing Number
2300999/2003
Filing Date
26-03-2003
Registration No
2300999/2003
Registration Date
26-03-2003
Court
Railway Court Gorakhpur
Judge
23-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
G.R.P. Gorakhpur
Year
2003
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Govenrment
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
MANOJ DWIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 23-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway)
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Gorakhpur acquitted Manoj Dwedi of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504 and Railway Act Sections 145, 146 in a case involving alleged assault and abusive behavior toward a train ticketing inspector on February 3, 2003. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (the alleged victim) specifically stated during examination that the accused did not assault or abuse him and could not identify the accused as the actual perpetrator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Gorakhpur acquitted Manoj Dwedi of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504 and Railway Act Sections 145, 146 in a case involving alleged assault and abusive behavior toward a train ticketing inspector on February 3, 2003. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole prosecution witness (the alleged victim) specifically stated during examination that the accused did not assault or abuse him and could not identify the accused as the actual perpetrator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts