rajesh ray vs ashok ray — 239/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section o9r9cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Cases

CNR: UPGK120043902025

Filing Number

1905/2025

Filing Date

09-Oct-2025

Registration No

239/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Court

Outlying Court Bansgaon

Judge

2-Addl Civil Judge Junior Division

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section o9r9cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.rajesh ray

    Adv. Hanuman Prasad Dubey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ashok ray

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Gorakhpur allowed the petition and set aside the dismissal order dated 18.09.2025 in case No. 734/2011 (Rajesh Ray v. Ashok Ray), restoring the original suit on merits. The court found that the case was dismissed in the absence of both parties due to non-appearance, and applying the principle that dismissals based on default should be reconsidered when both sides are absent, it recalled the order and restored the case for decision on merit grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl Civil Judge Junior Division

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposal of Oth er Appl .

    Addl Civil Judge Junior Division

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Disposal of Oth er Appl .

    Addl Civil Judge Junior Division

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Disposal of Oth er Appl .

    Addl Civil Judge Junior Division

  7. 09-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 239/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Civil Judge at Gorakhpur allowed the petition and set aside the dismissal order dated 18.09.2025 in case No. 734/2011 (Rajesh Ray v. Ashok Ray), restoring the original suit on merits. The court found that the case was dismissed in the absence of both parties due to non-appearance, and applying the principle that dismissals based on default should be reconsidered when both sides are absent, it recalled the order and restored the case for decision on merit grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case