KAMLESH YADAV vs MUNNA LAL — 302/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Disposal of 6C. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
Original Suit.
CNR: UPGK120009242019
Filing Number
391/2019
Filing Date
02-Apr-2019
Registration No
302/2019
Registration Date
02-Apr-2019
Court
Outlying Court Bansgaon
Judge
1-Civil Judge Junior Division
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMLESH YADAV
Adv. HUNMAN PRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNNA LAL
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
22-Dec-2025
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
03-Oct-2025
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
15-Jul-2025
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
29-Apr-2025
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
18-Feb-2025
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
04-Dec-2024
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Oct-2024
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
10-Jul-2024
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
08-Apr-2024
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
15-Jan-2024
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
28-Nov-2023
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
29-Aug-2023
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
19-Apr-2023
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Jan-2023
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
28-Sep-2022
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
24-May-2022
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
28-Mar-2022
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
25-Nov-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
25-Oct-2021
OrderView PDF
Court Order Summary Case: Kamlesh v. Munalal (Civil Suit No. 302/2019) Court: Civil Judge Junior Division, Bansgaon, Gorakhpur Date: 25-10-2021 Outcome: The court dismissed Petition 7-G (application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC seeking injunction against defendant's construction). The court found the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case that the disputed property (plots A, B, C, D) forms part of Schedule Nos. 32 & 33, as revenue maps indicate no physical boundary connection between these plots and Schedule No. 28 (where defendant claims construction rights). The balance of convenience and irreparable injury arguments were insufficient without proving ownership of the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Oct-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
18-Oct-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
07-Oct-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
22-Sep-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Sep-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
15-Sep-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
02-Sep-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
23-Aug-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
10-Aug-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
19-Jul-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
07-Jul-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
24-May-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
22-May-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
12-Apr-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
09-Mar-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
28-Jan-2021
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
22-Nov-2020
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
04-Jul-2020
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
27-May-2020
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
13-May-2020
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
21-Apr-2020
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
06-Feb-2020
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
08-Jan-2020
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
11-Nov-2019
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
30-Sep-2019
Disposal of 6C
Civil Judge Junior Division
-
02-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 302/2019
Court Order Summary Case: Kamlesh v. Munalal (Civil Suit No. 302/2019) Court: Civil Judge Junior Division, Bansgaon, Gorakhpur Date: 25-10-2021 Outcome: The court dismissed Petition 7-G (application under Order 39 Rules 1-2 and Section 151 CPC seeking injunction against defendant's construction). The court found the plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case that the disputed property (plots A, B, C, D) forms part of Schedule Nos. 32 & 33, as revenue maps indicate no physical boundary connection between these plots and Schedule No. 28 (where defendant claims construction rights). The balance of convenience and irreparable injury arguments were insufficient without proving ownership of the disputed land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts