HARIKESH YADAV vs State Gov. — 295/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPGK010097582025
Filing Number
9102/2025
Filing Date
05-Sep-2025
Registration No
295/2025
Registration Date
23-Sep-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HARIKESH YADAV
Adv. RUDAL YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
-
2.SURYANARAYAN YADAV
-
3.SHIVNARAYAN YADAV
-
4.KANHAIYA LAL YADAV
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Session Court in Gorakhpur dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Harikesh Yadav, finding it without merit and groundless. The court upheld the lower court's order dated 25.07.2025, which convicted three respondents (Surenaryayan, Shivnarayan, and Kanhaiya Lal Yadav) under Section 435 of the IPC for allegedly setting fire to the petitioner's hut, causing loss of property including documents worth ₹1,000. The court found no illegality or procedural error in the lower court's order warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 295/2025
Summary The Session Court in Gorakhpur dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Harikesh Yadav, finding it without merit and groundless. The court upheld the lower court's order dated 25.07.2025, which convicted three respondents (Surenaryayan, Shivnarayan, and Kanhaiya Lal Yadav) under Section 435 of the IPC for allegedly setting fire to the petitioner's hut, causing loss of property including documents worth ₹1,000. The court found no illegality or procedural error in the lower court's order warranting interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts