VAKIL vs State Gov. — 211/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPGK010069532025
Filing Number
6517/2025
Filing Date
01-Jul-2025
Registration No
211/2025
Registration Date
01-Jul-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VAKIL
Adv. JAICHAND SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
-
2.SHRI KISHUN
-
3.RAMESH
-
4.ALLAUDDIN
-
5.MANSINGH
-
6.RAMKRISHAN TRIPATHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Summary The Sessions Court at Gorakhpur dismissed a criminal revision petition filed under IPC Section 438 on March 10, 2026. The petitioner challenged a trial court order rejecting his plea regarding disputed ancestral property, claiming the lower court failed to properly consider evidence and jurisdictional issues. The court upheld the dismissal, finding the revision petition lacked legal merit as civil property disputes cannot be converted into criminal proceedings under Section 173(4) IPC, and determined no arbitrary exercise of judicial authority had occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Oct-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
01-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 211/2025
Summary The Sessions Court at Gorakhpur dismissed a criminal revision petition filed under IPC Section 438 on March 10, 2026. The petitioner challenged a trial court order rejecting his plea regarding disputed ancestral property, claiming the lower court failed to properly consider evidence and jurisdictional issues. The court upheld the dismissal, finding the revision petition lacked legal merit as civil property disputes cannot be converted into criminal proceedings under Section 173(4) IPC, and determined no arbitrary exercise of judicial authority had occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts