RAJATRAJ CHAUHAN vs State Gov. — 1018/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(4),352,351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 20th May 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010024002026
Filing Number
2232/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
1018/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-ADJ, C. No. 2
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
351
Police Station
Gorakhnath
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJATRAJ CHAUHAN
Adv. VISHAL TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
20-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted conditional bail to accused Rajatraj Chouhan in a kidnapping case (FIR 351/2025) under IPC sections 140(4), 352, 351(3), and 3(5). The court found that while a 17-year-old girl was allegedly abducted by Chouhan and associates, the victim's statement and police investigation did not establish Chouhan's specific role in the crime, and the main accused (Laki Tripathi) had already been granted bail, making Chouhan's detention unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Disposed
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
19-May-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
18-May-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
12-May-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
08-May-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
04-May-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
18-Apr-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
07-Apr-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
03-Apr-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ, C. No. 2
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1018/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted conditional bail to accused Rajatraj Chouhan in a kidnapping case (FIR 351/2025) under IPC sections 140(4), 352, 351(3), and 3(5). The court found that while a 17-year-old girl was allegedly abducted by Chouhan and associates, the victim's statement and police investigation did not establish Chouhan's specific role in the crime, and the main accused (Laki Tripathi) had already been granted bail, making Chouhan's detention unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts