AARISH ZAHEER vs State Gov. — 1014/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023922026
Filing Number
2225/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1014/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-ADJ/ Special Judge (EC Act)
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
Tiwaripur
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AARISH ZAHEER
Adv. VINOD KUMAR TRIPTHI
Respondent(s)
State Gov.
Hearing History
Judge: 5-ADJ/ Special Judge (EC Act)
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Gorakhpur granted bail to Arish Jahi in a case involving charges under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita related to illegal tampering with electricity transformers. The court found that while the accusation of theft of electrical equipment appeared prima facie, the applicant had no criminal history, all investigating officers were neutral, and no independent witness existed to establish the charges. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and several conditions restricting the applicant's movement and requiring court appearance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Gorakhpur granted bail to Arish Jahi in a case involving charges under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita related to illegal tampering with electricity transformers. The court found that while the accusation of theft of electrical equipment appeared prima facie, the applicant had no criminal history, all investigating officers were neutral, and no independent witness existed to establish the charges. Bail was granted on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties and several conditions restricting the applicant's movement and requiring court appearance during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts