RAHUL VERMA vs State Gov. — 1013/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023912026

Filing Number

2224/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1013/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-ADJ/ Special Judge (Ec Act)

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

34

Police Station

Tiwaripur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL VERMA

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to Rahul Verma, accused of theft under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the BNS, on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court found insufficient evidence linking the applicant to the stolen transformer parts, noting the absence of independent witnesses and no criminal history, thereby accepting the bail petition while imposing conditions against witness intimidation and ensuring regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/ Special Judge (Ec Act)

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/ Special Judge (Ec Act)

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1013/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Rahul Verma, accused of theft under Sections 303(2) and 317(2) of the BNS, on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. The court found insufficient evidence linking the applicant to the stolen transformer parts, noting the absence of independent witnesses and no criminal history, thereby accepting the bail petition while imposing conditions against witness intimidation and ensuring regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case