JHUNNU MIR vs State Gov. — 1007/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305C,317(2),317(4). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th March 2026.

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023882026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2221/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1007/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

228

Police Station

G.R.P. (Gorakhpur)

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305C,317(2),317(4)

Petitioner(s)

JHUNNU MIR

Adv. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

State Gov.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

19-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Hearing

17-03-2026

Hearing

11-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

19-03-2026
Order

The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted bail to the accused Jhunnu Mir in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 305(C), 317(2), and 317(4) for an alleged phone scam and theft. The court found that the prosecution's case lacked independent credible witnesses, the recovered mobile phones had no direct connection to the accused, and the FIR was based solely on police statements. Bail was approved on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation and appearance before investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted bail to the accused Jhunnu Mir in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 305(C), 317(2), and 317(4) for an alleged phone scam and theft. The court found that the prosecution's case lacked independent credible witnesses, the recovered mobile phones had no direct connection to the accused, and the FIR was based solely on police statements. Bail was approved on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation and appearance before investigating officers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case