JHUNNU MIR vs State Gov. — 1008/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305C,317(2),317(4). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023872026

Filing Number

2220/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1008/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

8

Police Station

G.R.P. (Gorakhpur)

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305C,317(2),317(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JHUNNU MIR

    Adv. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Gorakhpur granted bail to accused Jhunnu Mir in a theft case (IPC Sections 305(C), 317(2), 317(4)) filed on FIR 08/2026. The court found insufficient independent evidence linking the accused to stolen mobile phones and cash recovered during the arrest, noting the recovery was based solely on police testimony without corroborating witnesses. Bail was granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including cooperation in investigation and appearance before the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1008/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Gorakhpur granted bail to accused Jhunnu Mir in a theft case (IPC Sections 305(C), 317(2), 317(4)) filed on FIR 08/2026. The court found insufficient independent evidence linking the accused to stolen mobile phones and cash recovered during the arrest, noting the recovery was based solely on police testimony without corroborating witnesses. Bail was granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including cooperation in investigation and appearance before the investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case