DHIRAJ CHAURASIYA vs State Gov. — 1009/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,331(4),317(2),317(4),317(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023862026

Filing Number

2219/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1009/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

74

Police Station

Khorabar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305,331(4),317(2),317(4),317(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHIRAJ CHAURASIYA

    Adv. VIVEK KUMAR RATNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court in Gorakhpur granted bail to Dhiraj Chaurasia (age 23) in a burglary case registered under IPC sections 305, 331(4), 317(2), 317(4), and 317(5). The court found that while stolen items were recovered and the accused was arrested following a police operation on March 1, 2026, there was no independent eyewitness to the alleged theft and the accused had no prior criminal history. The court approved bail on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including cooperation during investigation and appearance before the investigating officer when summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1009/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court in Gorakhpur granted bail to Dhiraj Chaurasia (age 23) in a burglary case registered under IPC sections 305, 331(4), 317(2), 317(4), and 317(5). The court found that while stolen items were recovered and the accused was arrested following a police operation on March 1, 2026, there was no independent eyewitness to the alleged theft and the accused had no prior criminal history. The court approved bail on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with conditions including cooperation during investigation and appearance before the investigating officer when summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case