KANCHAN PANDEY vs State Gov. — 1005/2026

Case under Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023472026

Filing Number

2181/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

1005/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-ADJ/ Special Judge (Ec Act)

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

563

Police Station

ANTI POWER THEFT THANA GORAKHPUR

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANCHAN PANDEY

    Adv. AMIT KUMAR SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge at Gorakhpur granted bail to Kanchan Pandey in a case involving alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found that while the charges were serious and carried a punishment of up to 7 years imprisonment, the applicant's personal circumstances (50-year-old homemaker with no criminal history) and merits of the case warranted bail on conditions including a bond of Rs. 20,000, regular court appearance, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/ Special Judge (Ec Act)

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1005/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge at Gorakhpur granted bail to Kanchan Pandey in a case involving alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The court found that while the charges were serious and carried a punishment of up to 7 years imprisonment, the applicant's personal circumstances (50-year-old homemaker with no criminal history) and merits of the case warranted bail on conditions including a bond of Rs. 20,000, regular court appearance, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case