ANOOP YADAV vs State Gov. — 991/2026
Case under Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)D,3(1)DH. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 28th April 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023332026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2167/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
991/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-ADJ/ Special Judge (SC/ ST Act)
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
109
Police Station
Uruwa
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANOOP YADAV
Adv. ANAND KUMAR TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
State Gov.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADJ/ Special Judge (SC/ ST Act)
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 03-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 28-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Act), Gorakhpur granted bail to accused Anup Yadav in bail petition no. 991/2026. The court found that while the accused was charged with assault and wrongful restraint (IPC Sections 323, 504, 506), the prosecution failed to present evidence of misuse of bail. Since the accused is already in judicial custody with no criminal history and the opposing party filed a counter-case (establishing it as a cross-case), the court approved bail with personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Act), Gorakhpur granted bail to accused Anup Yadav in bail petition no. 991/2026. The court found that while the accused was charged with assault and wrongful restraint (IPC Sections 323, 504, 506), the prosecution failed to present evidence of misuse of bail. Since the accused is already in judicial custody with no criminal history and the opposing party filed a counter-case (establishing it as a cross-case), the court approved bail with personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts