VIJAY PRATAP SINGH vs STATE OF UP — 990/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),125,109(1),352,351(3),117(2). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023232026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2164/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
990/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Sikariganj
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAY PRATAP SINGH
Adv. YASHWANT SINGH
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Vijay Pratap Singh (Case No. 990/2026) filed under Section 482 CrPC. The court found that the accused is named in the FIR and prima facie appears involved in an incident on 22.01.2026 where the complainant sustained 11 serious injuries including head trauma, bruises, and internal bleeding after being attacked with sticks and bricks by the accused and co-accused. Considering the severity of charges under IPC Sections 191, 115, 125, 109, 352, 351(3), and 117(2), and risks of evidence tampering and witness intimidation, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Vijay Pratap Singh (Case No. 990/2026) filed under Section 482 CrPC. The court found that the accused is named in the FIR and prima facie appears involved in an incident on 22.01.2026 where the complainant sustained 11 serious injuries including head trauma, bruises, and internal bleeding after being attacked with sticks and bricks by the accused and co-accused. Considering the severity of charges under IPC Sections 191, 115, 125, 109, 352, 351(3), and 117(2), and risks of evidence tampering and witness intimidation, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts