SANT vs State Gov. — 997/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,323,506. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023192026

Filing Number

2160/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

997/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

217A

Police Station

Rajghat

Year

2007

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 147,323,506
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(10)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANT

    Adv. JAI JAI RAM PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Gorakhpur District and Sessions Court granted second bail to Sant Shiv Kumar Chaturvedi (age ~50) under IPC Sections 147, 323, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)10 on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, considering his prior bail status, health issues (heart disease, hypertension), and continuous custody since March 8, 2026. The court accepted the bail petition on grounds of merit and circumstances, though the prosecution opposed it citing non-compliance with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 997/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gorakhpur District and Sessions Court granted second bail to Sant Shiv Kumar Chaturvedi (age ~50) under IPC Sections 147, 323, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)10 on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, considering his prior bail status, health issues (heart disease, hypertension), and continuous custody since March 8, 2026. The court accepted the bail petition on grounds of merit and circumstances, though the prosecution opposed it citing non-compliance with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case