SHESHNATH NISHAD vs STATE OF U.P. — 984/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(2),191(2),190,115(2),352,61(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023112026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2152/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
984/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
138
Police Station
Chiluwatal
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHESHNATH NISHAD
Adv. VIRENDRA DHAR DUBEY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur dismissed the bail petition of Shehnath Nishad under Section 483 of the CrPC. The court found that Nishad, along with 20-25 unnamed accomplices, unlawfully assembled and attacked three individuals with lathis and sticks on March 4, 2026, resulting in the death of Jnanendra Kumar Singh from serious head injuries. Medical examination confirmed two severe skull fractures causing fatal bleeding. The court rejected the petitioner's plea of innocence, noting the credible eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evidence establishing his culpability in the criminal conspiracy and premeditated attack. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur dismissed the bail petition of Shehnath Nishad under Section 483 of the CrPC. The court found that Nishad, along with 20-25 unnamed accomplices, unlawfully assembled and attacked three individuals with lathis and sticks on March 4, 2026, resulting in the death of Jnanendra Kumar Singh from serious head injuries. Medical examination confirmed two severe skull fractures causing fatal bleeding. The court rejected the petitioner's plea of innocence, noting the credible eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evidence establishing his culpability in the criminal conspiracy and premeditated attack. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts