JAGDAMBA PRASAD SHUKLA vs STATE OF UP — 983/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023102026

Filing Number

2151/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

983/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

Khajani

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2),352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDAMBA PRASAD SHUKLA

    Adv. BHANU PRATAP PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court at Gorakhpur rejected the bail application of Jagdamba Prasad Shukla, who is accused of cheating and fraudulently selling the same agricultural land to multiple parties under fabricated documents, involving charges under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, and 351(3). The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the FIR and investigation to support the prosecution's case and determined no strong grounds existed to grant bail at this stage of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 983/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court at Gorakhpur rejected the bail application of Jagdamba Prasad Shukla, who is accused of cheating and fraudulently selling the same agricultural land to multiple parties under fabricated documents, involving charges under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 352, and 351(3). The court found sufficient prima facie evidence in the FIR and investigation to support the prosecution's case and determined no strong grounds existed to grant bail at this stage of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case