RAVI YADAV vs STATE OF UP — 988/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,351(3),352,191(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 20th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023092026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2150/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
988/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
180
Police Station
Gulharia
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVI YADAV
Adv. PRABHU NATH BHATIYA
PRADDUMAN YADAV
DHANANJAY YADAV
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted conditional anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Ravi Yadav, Pradumn Yadav, and Dhannajay Yadav) on March 20, 2026, in a case involving allegations of attempt to murder and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 109, 351(3), 352, and 191. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged incident and noted inconsistencies between the FIR and medical examination report, which showed only 5 internal injuries with no external marks. The accused were released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with strict conditions including regular appearance before the investigating officer and court, prohibition from leaving the country without permission, and non-commission of further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted conditional anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Ravi Yadav, Pradumn Yadav, and Dhannajay Yadav) on March 20, 2026, in a case involving allegations of attempt to murder and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 109, 351(3), 352, and 191. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged incident and noted inconsistencies between the FIR and medical examination report, which showed only 5 internal injuries with no external marks. The accused were released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with strict conditions including regular appearance before the investigating officer and court, prohibition from leaving the country without permission, and non-commission of further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts