RAVI YADAV vs STATE OF UP — 988/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,351(3),352,191(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 20th March 2026.

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023092026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2150/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

988/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

180

Police Station

Gulharia

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109,351(3),352,191(2)

Petitioner(s)

RAVI YADAV

Adv. PRABHU NATH BHATIYA

PRADDUMAN YADAV

DHANANJAY YADAV

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

20-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
Order

Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted conditional anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Ravi Yadav, Pradumn Yadav, and Dhannajay Yadav) on March 20, 2026, in a case involving allegations of attempt to murder and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 109, 351(3), 352, and 191. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged incident and noted inconsistencies between the FIR and medical examination report, which showed only 5 internal injuries with no external marks. The accused were released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with strict conditions including regular appearance before the investigating officer and court, prohibition from leaving the country without permission, and non-commission of further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted conditional anticipatory bail to three accused persons (Ravi Yadav, Pradumn Yadav, and Dhannajay Yadav) on March 20, 2026, in a case involving allegations of attempt to murder and criminal intimidation under IPC Sections 109, 351(3), 352, and 191. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged incident and noted inconsistencies between the FIR and medical examination report, which showed only 5 internal injuries with no external marks. The accused were released on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with strict conditions including regular appearance before the investigating officer and court, prohibition from leaving the country without permission, and non-commission of further offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case