MANOJ VISHWAKARMA vs STATE OF UP — 987/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,504,506,468,471,120B. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023072026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2148/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
987/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
104
Police Station
RAMGARH TAAL
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANOJ VISHWAKARMA
Adv. ANURAG VISHWAKARMA
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Gorakhpur granted conditional anticipatory bail to Manoj Vishwakarm (accused in FIR No. 104/2023 for offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 504, 506, 468, 471, 120-B) on March 13, 2026. The applicant was accused of fraudulently obtaining ₹8.6 lakh from the complainant through forged documents after promising company dealership. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence linking the applicant directly to the conspiracy and ordered his release on bail with a ₹25,000 security bond and seven strict conditions, including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Gorakhpur granted conditional anticipatory bail to Manoj Vishwakarm (accused in FIR No. 104/2023 for offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 504, 506, 468, 471, 120-B) on March 13, 2026. The applicant was accused of fraudulently obtaining ₹8.6 lakh from the complainant through forged documents after promising company dealership. The court found insufficient prima facie evidence linking the applicant directly to the conspiracy and ordered his release on bail with a ₹25,000 security bond and seven strict conditions, including court appearance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts