ARJUN VERMA vs STATE OF UP — 979/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(1),191(2),109,308,352,351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010023042026

Filing Number

2145/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

979/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 07-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

Cantt

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(1),191(2),109,308,352,351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARJUN VERMA

    Adv. Ajay Kumar Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur dismissed the bail petition of Arjun Verma (accused in criminal case No. 21/2026) under charges including extortion, criminal intimidation, and attempt to cause grievous hurt under the Indian Penal Code. The court found substantial evidence against the accused, including eyewitness testimony that he and co-accused conspired to extort money from the complainant Vishal Mishra, threatened him with false rape accusations, and fired a gunshot that injured an innocent bystander. Given the serious nature of the charges and the accused's involvement, the court ruled that releasing him on bail was not warranted at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 979/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur dismissed the bail petition of Arjun Verma (accused in criminal case No. 21/2026) under charges including extortion, criminal intimidation, and attempt to cause grievous hurt under the Indian Penal Code. The court found substantial evidence against the accused, including eyewitness testimony that he and co-accused conspired to extort money from the complainant Vishal Mishra, threatened him with false rape accusations, and fired a gunshot that injured an innocent bystander. Given the serious nature of the charges and the accused's involvement, the court ruled that releasing him on bail was not warranted at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case