ARJUN VERMA vs STATE OF UP — 979/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(1),191(2),109,308,352,351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023042026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2145/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
979/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
21
Police Station
Cantt
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARJUN VERMA
Adv. Ajay Kumar Pandey
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur dismissed the bail petition of Arjun Verma (accused in criminal case No. 21/2026) under charges including extortion, criminal intimidation, and attempt to cause grievous hurt under the Indian Penal Code. The court found substantial evidence against the accused, including eyewitness testimony that he and co-accused conspired to extort money from the complainant Vishal Mishra, threatened him with false rape accusations, and fired a gunshot that injured an innocent bystander. Given the serious nature of the charges and the accused's involvement, the court ruled that releasing him on bail was not warranted at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur dismissed the bail petition of Arjun Verma (accused in criminal case No. 21/2026) under charges including extortion, criminal intimidation, and attempt to cause grievous hurt under the Indian Penal Code. The court found substantial evidence against the accused, including eyewitness testimony that he and co-accused conspired to extort money from the complainant Vishal Mishra, threatened him with false rape accusations, and fired a gunshot that injured an innocent bystander. Given the serious nature of the charges and the accused's involvement, the court ruled that releasing him on bail was not warranted at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts