SUFIYAN AKHTAR vs STATE OF UP — 978/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 317(2),317(4),317(5),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023032026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2144/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
978/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-ADJ, CNo. 8
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
172
Police Station
G.R.P. (Gorakhpur)
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUFIYAN AKHTAR
Adv. HABIB JAFAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UP
Hearing History
Judge: 10-ADJ, CNo. 8
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted bail to Sufian Akhtar (age 20) in Bail Application No. 978/2026 under sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), and 3(5) of the BNS. The applicant was arrested on charges of mobile phone theft at railway stations and platforms in conspiracy with co-accused. The court found sufficient grounds for bail, noting: (1) no independent civilian witness exists, making the recovery questionable; (2) co-accused have already been released on bail; (3) the applicant has been detained since 20.07.2025; and (4) he is a permanent resident with no flight risk. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including court appearance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted bail to Sufian Akhtar (age 20) in Bail Application No. 978/2026 under sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), and 3(5) of the BNS. The applicant was arrested on charges of mobile phone theft at railway stations and platforms in conspiracy with co-accused. The court found sufficient grounds for bail, noting: (1) no independent civilian witness exists, making the recovery questionable; (2) co-accused have already been released on bail; (3) the applicant has been detained since 20.07.2025; and (4) he is a permanent resident with no flight risk. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹75,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including court appearance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts