SUFIYAN AKHTAR vs STATE OF UP — 977/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(4),317(5),3(5). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010023022026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
2143/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
977/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Additional District & Session Judge CNo. 4
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
170
Police Station
G.R.P. (Gorakhpur)
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUFIYAN AKHTAR
Adv. HABIB JAFAR
Respondent(s)
STATE OF UP
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Additional District & Session Judge CNo. 4
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted bail to Sufiyan Akhtar in a mobile theft case (FIR under IPC sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 3(5)). The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the prior criminal history and alleged recovery of stolen mobiles, noting that bail decisions cannot be based solely on past criminal records and that co-accused had already been granted bail. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional upon cooperating with trial proceedings and maintaining regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted bail to Sufiyan Akhtar in a mobile theft case (FIR under IPC sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 3(5)). The court found sufficient grounds for bail despite the prior criminal history and alleged recovery of stolen mobiles, noting that bail decisions cannot be based solely on past criminal records and that co-accused had already been granted bail. The applicant was released on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional upon cooperating with trial proceedings and maintaining regular court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts