SANJEEV KUSHWAHA vs State Gov. — 937/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 111(2)(b),318(4),61(2). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010021482026

Filing Number

2001/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

937/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

126

Police Station

RAMGARH TAAL

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 111(2)(b),318(4),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJEEV KUSHWAHA

    Adv. NEERAJ KUMAR SHAHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Gorakhpur District Court rejected the bail application of Sanjeev Kushwaha, accused in a cryptocurrency fraud scheme. The court found that Kushwaha and co-accused Ankit Srivastava conspired to defraud investors by luring them with false promises of high returns on Bitcoin and cryptocurrency investments through seminars at a hotel, ultimately deceiving multiple victims and absconding with their money. The serious nature of the offenses and evidence on record demonstrated involvement in an organized criminal conspiracy, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 937/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gorakhpur District Court rejected the bail application of Sanjeev Kushwaha, accused in a cryptocurrency fraud scheme. The court found that Kushwaha and co-accused Ankit Srivastava conspired to defraud investors by luring them with false promises of high returns on Bitcoin and cryptocurrency investments through seminars at a hotel, ultimately deceiving multiple victims and absconding with their money. The serious nature of the offenses and evidence on record demonstrated involvement in an organized criminal conspiracy, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case