AKHILESH vs State Gov. — 931/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010021292026

Filing Number

1987/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

931/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

75

Police Station

Pipiganj

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKHILESH

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

  2. 2.KAMLESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the bail plea of applicants Akhilesh and Kamlesh under Section 103(1) IPC for Case No. 75/2026. The court found that the applicants, along with others, were involved in the death of Shailesh by drowning him in the Rohini River on March 2, 2026, and that the eyewitness account corroborated the prosecution's case. The court determined there was no justified basis for granting bail given the serious nature of the offense and the applicants' alleged active role in the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 931/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the bail plea of applicants Akhilesh and Kamlesh under Section 103(1) IPC for Case No. 75/2026. The court found that the applicants, along with others, were involved in the death of Shailesh by drowning him in the Rohini River on March 2, 2026, and that the eyewitness account corroborated the prosecution's case. The court determined there was no justified basis for granting bail given the serious nature of the offense and the applicants' alleged active role in the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case