KESHAV PRASAD vs State Gov. — 929/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010021272026

Filing Number

1985/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

929/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

103

Police Station

Sahjanawa

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,80(2)
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KESHAV PRASAD

    Adv. MRITUNJAY RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the bail petition of Keshav Prasad, accused of abetting the dowry death of his sister-in-law Mansha Gupta under IPC Sections 85, 80(2) and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found credible evidence including the deceased's autopsy report showing ligature marks on her neck, witness statements from the victim's mother and brother corroborating harassment for dowry, and the serious nature of the offense committed within seven years of marriage, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 929/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the bail petition of Keshav Prasad, accused of abetting the dowry death of his sister-in-law Mansha Gupta under IPC Sections 85, 80(2) and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court found credible evidence including the deceased's autopsy report showing ligature marks on her neck, witness statements from the victim's mother and brother corroborating harassment for dowry, and the serious nature of the offense committed within seven years of marriage, making bail unsuitable at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case