RAJ vs State Gov. — 935/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010021212026

Filing Number

1980/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

935/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

94

Police Station

Sahjanawa

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),61(2)
Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention Unfair Means) Act, 1998 Section 13(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ

    Adv. RAHUL TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court granted conditional bail to accused Raj, who was arrested for impersonation during an examination on 20.02.2026 (using a fake admit card in place of the actual examinee). The accused was ordered released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to strict conditions including court appearance, non-commission of similar offenses, and non-intimidation of witnesses during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 935/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court granted conditional bail to accused Raj, who was arrested for impersonation during an examination on 20.02.2026 (using a fake admit card in place of the actual examinee). The accused was ordered released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to strict conditions including court appearance, non-commission of similar offenses, and non-intimidation of witnesses during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case