VISHAL YADAV vs State Gov. — 897/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),352,109(1),324(4). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010020142026

Filing Number

1875/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

897/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

74

Police Station

Badahalganj

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),352,109(1),324(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL YADAV

    Adv. SHANKAR SHARAN TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

  2. 2.JAGDISH YADAV URF PINTU

  3. 3.MUKESH YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail petition filed by three accused (Vishal Yadav, Jagdish Yadav, and Mukesh Yadav) charged under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 109(1), and 324(4) for allegedly assaulting two victims on 14-02-2026 with weapons, causing serious injuries including head fractures and brain damage requiring surgery. The court found the allegations grave and the accused's involvement in the crime well-substantiated by medical evidence and FIR statements, determining bail was not warranted at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 897/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail petition filed by three accused (Vishal Yadav, Jagdish Yadav, and Mukesh Yadav) charged under IPC sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 109(1), and 324(4) for allegedly assaulting two victims on 14-02-2026 with weapons, causing serious injuries including head fractures and brain damage requiring surgery. The court found the allegations grave and the accused's involvement in the crime well-substantiated by medical evidence and FIR statements, determining bail was not warranted at this stage of investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case