GAURAV ALIAS VIRU SHAHNI vs State Gov. — 902/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),115(2),140(2). Disposed: Uncontested--Not Press on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010020022026

Filing Number

1863/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

902/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Not Press

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

21

Police Station

Shahpur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61(2),115(2),140(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAURAV ALIAS VIRU SHAHNI

    Adv. VISHNU KUMAR UPADHYAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Gaurav alias Veeru Sahni against the State of Uttar Pradesh, citing insufficient grounds and lack of proper justification for granting bail. The court found that the petitioner's learned counsel failed to provide valid reasons to support the bail application, leading to its dismissal on March 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 902/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Gaurav alias Veeru Sahni against the State of Uttar Pradesh, citing insufficient grounds and lack of proper justification for granting bail. The court found that the petitioner's learned counsel failed to provide valid reasons to support the bail application, leading to its dismissal on March 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case