SURAJ GUPTA vs State Gov. — 881/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,78,296(A),352,351(3),3(5),75,196,308. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010019702026

Filing Number

1834/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

881/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

AIIMS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,78,296(A),352,351(3),3(5),75,196,308

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)DA,DHA,3(2)(XA),3(2)V

Petitioner(s)

1.SURAJ GUPTA

Adv. NEERAJ KUMAR SHAHI

Respondent(s)

1.State Gov.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
20-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Act), Gorakhpur granted bail to the accused Suraj (19 years) in a petition dated March 20, 2026. The court found that while charges were filed under BNS sections including 74, 78, 296(a), 352, 351(3), and SC/ST Act provisions for allegedly attacking a female doctor with three others, the evidence was insufficient to conclusively establish guilt, and the accused had been in custody since February 25, 2026. The court ordered bail of Rs. 50,000 with personal bond, citing established precedent that sentences under 7 years warrant bail without substantial loss-causing grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
20-Mar-2026

Disposed

ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
17-Mar-2026

Hearing

ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
10-Mar-2026

Hearing

ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
26-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
26-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 881/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Act), Gorakhpur granted bail to the accused Suraj (19 years) in a petition dated March 20, 2026. The court found that while charges were filed under BNS sections including 74, 78, 296(a), 352, 351(3), and SC/ST Act provisions for allegedly attacking a female doctor with three others, the evidence was insufficient to conclusively establish guilt, and the accused had been in custody since February 25, 2026. The court ordered bail of Rs. 50,000 with personal bond, citing established precedent that sentences under 7 years warrant bail without substantial loss-causing grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.