AMRIT VISWAKARMA vs State Gov. — 882/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,78,296(a),352,351(3),3(5),75,196,308. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010019692026

Filing Number

1833/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

882/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

52

Police Station

AIIMS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,78,296(a),352,351(3),3(5),75,196,308
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)DA,DHA,3(2)(XA),3(2)V

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMRIT VISWAKARMA

    Adv. NEERAJ KUMAR SHAHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to 19-year-old Amrit Vishwakarm, who was accused of assaulting a female doctor at AIMS Hospital, Gorakhpur on February 22, 2026, along with two others. The judge accepted the bail petition, noting that the accused had no prior criminal history, the charges carried a maximum 7-year sentence, and he had been in custody since February 25, 2026, ordering him to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 882/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to 19-year-old Amrit Vishwakarm, who was accused of assaulting a female doctor at AIMS Hospital, Gorakhpur on February 22, 2026, along with two others. The judge accepted the bail petition, noting that the accused had no prior criminal history, the charges carried a maximum 7-year sentence, and he had been in custody since February 25, 2026, ordering him to furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case