AYUB SHEIKH vs STATE OF UP — 865/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(3),85,89. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010019482026

Filing Number

1812/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

865/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

Campierganj

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(3),85,89
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AYUB SHEIKH

    Adv. SAURABH TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to the accused Ayyub Sheikh in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 351(3), 85, 89 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, finding insufficient medical evidence of the alleged forced miscarriage and noting the FIR was filed 12 days after the incident. The accused was released on bail with conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of the same amount, along with various behavioral restrictions during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 865/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to the accused Ayyub Sheikh in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 351(3), 85, 89 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, finding insufficient medical evidence of the alleged forced miscarriage and noting the FIR was filed 12 days after the incident. The accused was released on bail with conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of the same amount, along with various behavioral restrictions during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case