SAURABH KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF UP — 863/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010019452026

Filing Number

1809/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

863/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

89

Police Station

Pipraich

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2)
Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention Unfair Means) Act, 1998 Section 7,13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAURABH KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. RAM ASHISH PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF UP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Gorakhpur accepted the bail petition of Saurav Kumar Gupta, accused of using forged admit cards to enable other students to impersonate them during a board examination on 23.02.2026. The court found insufficient evidence of the accused's direct involvement in the crime and granted bail on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions including regular appearance before the court and prohibition from tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 863/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Gorakhpur accepted the bail petition of Saurav Kumar Gupta, accused of using forged admit cards to enable other students to impersonate them during a board examination on 23.02.2026. The court found insufficient evidence of the accused's direct involvement in the crime and granted bail on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions including regular appearance before the court and prohibition from tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case