SAURABH KUMAR GUPTA vs STATE OF UP — 863/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010019452026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1809/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

863/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

89

Police Station

Pipraich

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2)
Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention Unfair Means) Act, 1998 Section 7,13(3)

Petitioner(s)

SAURABH KUMAR GUPTA

Adv. RAM ASHISH PRAJAPATI

Respondent(s)

STATE OF UP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Gorakhpur accepted the bail petition of Saurav Kumar Gupta, accused of using forged admit cards to enable other students to impersonate them during a board examination on 23.02.2026. The court found insufficient evidence of the accused's direct involvement in the crime and granted bail on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions including regular appearance before the court and prohibition from tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court in Gorakhpur accepted the bail petition of Saurav Kumar Gupta, accused of using forged admit cards to enable other students to impersonate them during a board examination on 23.02.2026. The court found insufficient evidence of the accused's direct involvement in the crime and granted bail on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions including regular appearance before the court and prohibition from tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case