LALSA YADAV vs State Gov. — 845/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),351(3),61(2),338,336(3),340(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010018302026

Filing Number

1696/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

845/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1056

Police Station

Gulharia

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),351(3),61(2),338,336(3),340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LALSA YADAV

    Adv. AMIR YAKUB KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

  2. 2.KAMLESH YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur dismissed an anticipatory bail application (No. 845/2026) filed by Lalasa Yadav and another because the applicants failed to appear repeatedly despite multiple court calls and did not submit any adjournment request, indicating abandonment of the petition. The court found no merit remaining in the application and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 845/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur dismissed an anticipatory bail application (No. 845/2026) filed by Lalasa Yadav and another because the applicants failed to appear repeatedly despite multiple court calls and did not submit any adjournment request, indicating abandonment of the petition. The court found no merit remaining in the application and dismissed it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case