JAYDEEP MITRA vs State Gov. — 791/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 193,196,218,409,467,468,471,420,120B. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010016482026
Filing Number
1519/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
791/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
901
Police Station
Cantt
Year
1999
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAYDEEP MITRA
Adv. ANIL KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court granted bail to the applicant Jayadip Mitra in a bank embezzlement case involving alleged fraudulent withdrawal of approximately Rs. 31 lakh through multiple accounts. The court accepted the bail petition after considering that the main accused Rakesh Kumar Srivastava had already been granted bail, the investigation had been ongoing for 26 years without conclusive evidence, and the applicant is an elderly retired citizen with social standing. The applicant was ordered to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount and appear in court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 791/2026
The court granted bail to the applicant Jayadip Mitra in a bank embezzlement case involving alleged fraudulent withdrawal of approximately Rs. 31 lakh through multiple accounts. The court accepted the bail petition after considering that the main accused Rakesh Kumar Srivastava had already been granted bail, the investigation had been ongoing for 26 years without conclusive evidence, and the applicant is an elderly retired citizen with social standing. The applicant was ordered to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of equal amount and appear in court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts