SADDAM ALI vs State Gov. — 799/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010016412026
Filing Number
1513/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
799/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
487
Police Station
Gagaha
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SADDAM ALI
Adv. PARSHURAM PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Act Special), Gorakhpur granted bail to accused Saddam Ali in a bail application (No. 799/2026) dated March 13, 2026. The court found that while the accused was charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the complainant and using caste-based slurs on September 28, 2022, the evidence and circumstances did not warrant continued detention. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and a surety of equal amount, requiring the accused to appear in person at each hearing and cooperate in the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 799/2026
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Act Special), Gorakhpur granted bail to accused Saddam Ali in a bail application (No. 799/2026) dated March 13, 2026. The court found that while the accused was charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the complainant and using caste-based slurs on September 28, 2022, the evidence and circumstances did not warrant continued detention. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and a surety of equal amount, requiring the accused to appear in person at each hearing and cooperate in the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts