SADDAM ALI vs State Gov. — 799/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 13th March 2026.

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010016412026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1513/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

799/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

FIR Details

FIR Number

487

Police Station

Gagaha

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)D,3(1)DH

Petitioner(s)

SADDAM ALI

Adv. PARSHURAM PANDEY

Respondent(s)

State Gov.

Hearing History

Judge: 3-

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

23-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order

Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Act Special), Gorakhpur granted bail to accused Saddam Ali in a bail application (No. 799/2026) dated March 13, 2026. The court found that while the accused was charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the complainant and using caste-based slurs on September 28, 2022, the evidence and circumstances did not warrant continued detention. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and a surety of equal amount, requiring the accused to appear in person at each hearing and cooperate in the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Court (SC/ST Act Special), Gorakhpur granted bail to accused Saddam Ali in a bail application (No. 799/2026) dated March 13, 2026. The court found that while the accused was charged under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d) for allegedly assaulting the complainant and using caste-based slurs on September 28, 2022, the evidence and circumstances did not warrant continued detention. The court imposed conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 and a surety of equal amount, requiring the accused to appear in person at each hearing and cooperate in the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case