SAZIDA KHATOON vs State Gov. — 796/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,467,468,471,506. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 23rd March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010016272026
Filing Number
1501/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
796/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
476
Police Station
Khajani
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAZIDA KHATOON
Adv. RAMPRAVESH PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Sajida Khatun (accused) in FIR No. 476/2025 under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 506. The court found that Sajida Khatun, in connivance with a co-accused, fraudulently transferred 17.75 dismil land in her name to 45.50 dismil land in others' names through forged documents, obtaining ₹39,80,000 illegally. While the court acknowledged insufficient evidence to conclusively prove criminal intent, it found her prima facie complicity in a serious fraud and determined anticipatory bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 796/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail plea of Sajida Khatun (accused) in FIR No. 476/2025 under IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, and 506. The court found that Sajida Khatun, in connivance with a co-accused, fraudulently transferred 17.75 dismil land in her name to 45.50 dismil land in others' names through forged documents, obtaining ₹39,80,000 illegally. While the court acknowledged insufficient evidence to conclusively prove criminal intent, it found her prima facie complicity in a serious fraud and determined anticipatory bail was not warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts