AHMED RAZA SIDDIQUI ALIAS RAJ vs State Gov. — 776/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),109(1),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 26th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010015542026
Filing Number
1429/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
776/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
RAMGARH TAAL
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AHMED RAZA SIDDIQUI ALIAS RAJ
Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Gorakhpur approved the bail petition (No. 776/2026) of Ahmad Raza Siddiqui, finding that while charges under BNS sections 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST Act were levied involving alleged assault with caste-based slurs, the medical evidence showed only simple injuries of ordinary nature and no serious threat. The applicant was granted bail on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of regular appearance and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 776/2026
The Additional District and Sessions Judge at Gorakhpur approved the bail petition (No. 776/2026) of Ahmad Raza Siddiqui, finding that while charges under BNS sections 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST Act were levied involving alleged assault with caste-based slurs, the medical evidence showed only simple injuries of ordinary nature and no serious threat. The applicant was granted bail on personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of regular appearance and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts