MOHAMMAD BITTU SHAH ALIAS BITTY DEWAN vs State Gov. — 770/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),140(1),312,109,115(2),125,3(5),61(2). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 24th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010015352026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1410/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
770/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
705
Police Station
Pipraich
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMAD BITTU SHAH ALIAS BITTY DEWAN
Adv. SATISH CHANDRA
Respondent(s)
State Gov.
RAJU SHAH URF RAJU DEVAN URF RAJU SETH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 21-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Mohammad Bittu Sah and Raju Sah in a case involving alleged cattle theft, murder of the complainant's son, and violations of the Uttar Pradesh Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence linking the accused to a serious crime of murder, determining that bail was not warranted given the gravity of the offense and credible allegations against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Mohammad Bittu Sah and Raju Sah in a case involving alleged cattle theft, murder of the complainant's son, and violations of the Uttar Pradesh Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence linking the accused to a serious crime of murder, determining that bail was not warranted given the gravity of the offense and credible allegations against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts