SAZIDA KHATOON vs State Gov. — 769/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 419,420,467,468,471,506. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 23rd March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010015342026
Filing Number
1409/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
769/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
475
Police Station
Khajani
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAZIDA KHATOON
Adv. RAM PRAVESH PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sajida Khatun, who was accused of fraudulently transferring 17.75 dissemil (unit of land measurement) of property in her own name as 45.50 dissemil property in the names of the village head's wife and others, thereby misappropriating ₹39,80,000. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in cheating, forgery, and criminal intimidation (IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506), determining that bail was not warranted at this stage of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1
-
21-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 769/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sajida Khatun, who was accused of fraudulently transferring 17.75 dissemil (unit of land measurement) of property in her own name as 45.50 dissemil property in the names of the village head's wife and others, thereby misappropriating ₹39,80,000. The court found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in cheating, forgery, and criminal intimidation (IPC Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506), determining that bail was not warranted at this stage of the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts