KAMLAWATI DEVI vs RAMMILAN CHAUHAN — 175/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 30th March 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPGK010014572026
Filing Number
1341/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
175/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
3-
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Chiluwatal
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMLAWATI DEVI
Adv. MAHENDRA PRATAP YADAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMMILAN CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur dismissed the petition filed by Kamalavanti Devi under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). Although the petitioner alleged that respondent Rammilan Chauhan and others assaulted her, used caste-based slurs, and threatened her life on November 28, 2025, the court found no case file registered at the police station regarding these allegations. The court ruled that the petition lacked sufficient evidence requiring police investigation and noted that criminal proceedings (Case No. 769/2025) had already been registered under BNSS sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, and 351, while declining to register charges under SC/ST Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 175/2026
Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur dismissed the petition filed by Kamalavanti Devi under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). Although the petitioner alleged that respondent Rammilan Chauhan and others assaulted her, used caste-based slurs, and threatened her life on November 28, 2025, the court found no case file registered at the police station regarding these allegations. The court ruled that the petition lacked sufficient evidence requiring police investigation and noted that criminal proceedings (Case No. 769/2025) had already been registered under BNSS sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, and 351, while declining to register charges under SC/ST Act provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts