DEEPAK GAUD vs State Gov. — 714/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(3),117(2),126(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010014402026

Filing Number

1326/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

714/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

379

Police Station

Khorabar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),115(2),352,351(3),117(2),126(2)
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)(va),3(1)D,3(1)DH

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK GAUD

    Adv. PRADEEP KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court granted bail to accused Deepak Gaud in a case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), 126(2), and SC/ST Act sections 3(2)(va) & 3(1). The court found that while the complainant alleged assault and caste-based abuse by the accused and others, the medical report showed only simple injuries, no criminal history was established, and the FIR was filed 12 days after the incident. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the court approved bail on ₹50,000 personal bond with two sureties, without commenting on guilt or innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 714/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court granted bail to accused Deepak Gaud in a case involving charges under BNS sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), 126(2), and SC/ST Act sections 3(2)(va) & 3(1). The court found that while the complainant alleged assault and caste-based abuse by the accused and others, the medical report showed only simple injuries, no criminal history was established, and the FIR was filed 12 days after the incident. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the court approved bail on ₹50,000 personal bond with two sureties, without commenting on guilt or innocence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case