PRADEEP YADAV vs State Gov. — 712/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351(3),352. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010014392026

Filing Number

1325/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

712/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

113

Police Station

Gagaha

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 351(3),352
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)D,3(1)DH,3(2)VA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRADEEP YADAV

    Adv. PRABHU DAYAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur approved bail for Pradeep Yadav in Bail Application No. 712/2026, charged under BNS Sections 351(3), 352, and SC/ST Act provisions. The court ordered his release on personal bond of ₹50,000 with undertakings to appear in all proceedings, finding insufficient evidence of absconding risk or misuse of bail based on investigative facts and legal precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 712/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur approved bail for Pradeep Yadav in Bail Application No. 712/2026, charged under BNS Sections 351(3), 352, and SC/ST Act provisions. The court ordered his release on personal bond of ₹50,000 with undertakings to appear in all proceedings, finding insufficient evidence of absconding risk or misuse of bail based on investigative facts and legal precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case