VIVEK KUMAR SINGH vs State Gov. — 706/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3). Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010014132026

Filing Number

1299/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

706/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

33

Police Station

Shahpur

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIVEK KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. BHANU PRATAP PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Vivek Kumar Singh (Case No. 706/2026) accused under IPC Sections 318(4), 338, and 336(3). The court found prima facie evidence that Singh defrauded the complainant of approximately 21 lakh rupees by falsely promising MBBS admission abroad through a consultancy agency and providing forged invitation documents. The court held that sufficient grounds exist to believe Singh's involvement in the crime, and granting bail could lead to tampering with prosecution evidence and witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 706/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Vivek Kumar Singh (Case No. 706/2026) accused under IPC Sections 318(4), 338, and 336(3). The court found prima facie evidence that Singh defrauded the complainant of approximately 21 lakh rupees by falsely promising MBBS admission abroad through a consultancy agency and providing forged invitation documents. The court held that sufficient grounds exist to believe Singh's involvement in the crime, and granting bail could lead to tampering with prosecution evidence and witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case