ANIL YADAV vs State Gov. — 662/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,506,325. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010013302026

Filing Number

1226/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

662/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

3-ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

Khajani

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,506,325

Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)D,3(1)DH

Petitioner(s)

1.ANIL YADAV

Adv. WASIUDDIN KHAN

Respondent(s)

1.State Gov.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
18-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur granted bail to Anil Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 506, 325 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1), finding insufficient evidence of abuse of discretion. The court ordered his release on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and directed him to appear personally at all hearings without seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
18-Mar-2026

Disposed

ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
10-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF
10-Mar-2026

Hearing

ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
24-Feb-2026

OrderView PDF
24-Feb-2026

Hearing

ADJ/ Special Judge (Sc/ ST Act)
16-Feb-2026

OrderView PDF
16-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
16-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 662/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur granted bail to Anil Yadav in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 323, 506, 325 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1), finding insufficient evidence of abuse of discretion. The court ordered his release on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, and directed him to appear personally at all hearings without seeking adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.