VIPIN UPADHYAY vs State Gov. — 608/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 110,115(2),126(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010012382026
Filing Number
1146/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
608/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
135
Police Station
Harpur Budhat
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIPIN UPADHYAY
Adv. YOGESH PRATAP SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
-
2.PRANIN UPADHYAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted conditional anticipatory bail to the accused (Bipin Upadhyay and Pranhi Upadhyay) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 110, 115(2), and 126(2) for allegedly attacking the complainant with lathis and iron rods on July 15, 2025. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, no life-threatening risk was established medically, and the accused had no prior criminal record, distinguishing their case from co-accused who already obtained bail. The bail was granted on conditions including furnishing bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, regular appearance before the court, and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 608/2026
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted conditional anticipatory bail to the accused (Bipin Upadhyay and Pranhi Upadhyay) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 110, 115(2), and 126(2) for allegedly attacking the complainant with lathis and iron rods on July 15, 2025. The court found the injuries were simple in nature, no life-threatening risk was established medically, and the accused had no prior criminal record, distinguishing their case from co-accused who already obtained bail. The bail was granted on conditions including furnishing bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, regular appearance before the court, and compliance with standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts