VISHAL YADAV vs State Gov. — 612/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),351(3),352,110,331(6). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th March 2026.
Bail Application.
CNR: UPGK010012282026
Filing Number
1136/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
612/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 24-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
605
Police Station
GIDA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHAL YADAV
Adv. SHANKAR SHARAN TRIPATHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Gov.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary The Gorakhpur District Court granted bail to accused Vishal Yadav in a second bail application (Case No. 605/2025) under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 110, and 331(6), involving charges of assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused assaulted the complainant with others, no injury evidence directly linked the accused to the crime, and considering the nature of the offense and his clean criminal record, bail was justified. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 612/2026
Case Summary The Gorakhpur District Court granted bail to accused Vishal Yadav in a second bail application (Case No. 605/2025) under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352, 110, and 331(6), involving charges of assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused assaulted the complainant with others, no injury evidence directly linked the accused to the crime, and considering the nature of the offense and his clean criminal record, bail was justified. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including cooperation with investigation and court appearances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts