HARIDHAR vs State Gov. — 391/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),109,110,131,115(2),351(2),352. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application.

CNR: UPGK010008382026

Filing Number

783/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

391/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

561

Police Station

Sahjanawa

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),109,110,131,115(2),351(2),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARIDHAR

    Adv. MRITUNJAY RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Gov.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted bail to the accused Harish in a second interim bail application under CrPC Section 482. The court found that the accused was not arrested during investigation, cooperated with police, co-accused's bail was already approved by the High Court, and the chargesheet had been filed with no remaining evidence to be collected. The bail was granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including court cooperation and non-commission of similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court, Gorakhpur granted bail to the accused Harish in a second interim bail application under CrPC Section 482. The court found that the accused was not arrested during investigation, cooperated with police, co-accused's bail was already approved by the High Court, and the chargesheet had been filed with no remaining evidence to be collected. The bail was granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard conditions including court cooperation and non-commission of similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case