LAL BAHADUR vs State Government — 86/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPGK010005712024

Filing Number

524/2024

Filing Date

19-Jan-2024

Registration No

86/2024

Registration Date

03-Apr-2024

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAL BAHADUR

    Adv. NEERAJ KUMAR SHAHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Government

  2. 2.RAM MURAT SINGH

  3. 3.VANSH GOPAL JAISWAL

  4. 4.OMKAR GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the petition for criminal investigation filed by Lal Bahadur against the State of UP and others, finding the challenged order dated 25.10.2023 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) to be legally sound and factually correct. The court upheld the original order, holding that no interference was warranted as it was passed in accordance with the law and established judicial principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  7. 26-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  8. 01-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  9. 06-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  10. 09-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  11. 11-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  12. 01-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  13. 25-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  14. 23-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  15. 23-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  16. 23-May-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  17. 18-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  18. 28-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  19. 17-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  20. 15-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  21. 10-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  22. 06-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  23. 11-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  24. 16-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  25. 16-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  26. 16-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  27. 23-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  28. 06-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  29. 14-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  30. 23-May-2024

    Hearing

    Additional District and Session Judge, C.No. 1

  31. 06-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 19-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Court, Gorakhpur rejected the petition for criminal investigation filed by Lal Bahadur against the State of UP and others, finding the challenged order dated 25.10.2023 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) to be legally sound and factually correct. The court upheld the original order, holding that no interference was warranted as it was passed in accordance with the law and established judicial principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case